Monday, January 26, 2015

Is the Obama White House avoiding talking about "radical Islam," using the term "violent extremism" instead?

This question seems to pop up in many forms in the media recently, and will probably continue to be asked through the February White House meeting. Does it mean the White House fails to see accurately what is occurring?

If we fail to see and know what is so, can we respond adequately to what is occurring?

Here are some articles from different political perspectives:

And a French approach to "refusing to call a cat a cat" or "it is almost surreal to see how the White House avoids using the phrase ‘radical Islam.’"