Monday, January 16, 2012

Attachment, Non-attachment, Nonabiding




Elihu Genmyo Smith

“Caught in self-centered dream, only suffering; holding to self-centered thoughts exactly the dream.” These practice principles enable us to live the life we are, to chew-up the life we are. In the midst of arising-passing circumstances and conditions, not holding to attachment is fundamental life practice, Zen practice. To be at peace and free is not being caught by the varying conditions and circumstances of life. The Sixth Ancestor spoke of straightforward mind without attachment (upadana) , of nonabiding (wuzhu) as original nature. Baizhang spoke of three levels of practice accomplishment: non-attachment, not abiding in non-attachment, and no trace or self-awareness of “being free” of attachment.

Attachment is a most natural human functioning. There are all sorts of attachments: to beliefs, to identity of various sorts, to groups. Most of all, there is attachment to body-mind condition and to people. Of course, these are all intertwined. Here I will focus on attachment to others, which is built into our DNA, our biological and social nature. Look at animals of all sorts, especially at social animals such as elephants, domesticated animals such as dogs and our biologically close cousins, the primates. We see attachment, we see grieving. Look at humans in many varied societies. Hakuin writes, "Your debt to your parents is deeper than the sea. If you forget it you are lower than a dog or a cat… Parents are a field of fortune in an unsure world." Dogen writes "When you handle water, rice or anything else, you must have the affectionate and caring concern of a parent raising a child."

Once Joko said to me, “When biological ties are touched, especially mother-child, it is hard not to get caught.” I know this was true in her life and something she worked with regarding her own adult children. Working with this has been and continues to be an important practice realm for me. “Ties are touched” in all sorts of relations, biological, familial and others - whether it is concern and fear when someone is sick, grieving with a death, celebration with accomplishments, upset with behavior that is not what we want and so forth. Do we believe we can control the behavior of others? In the midst of ongoing change, the impermanence that is this life, there are always opportunities to see where we hold to attachments about what is happening to us or those to whom we are “attached.” What is non-attachment? Not being attached is not the same as non-attachment.

“Non-abiding” clarifies this, “caught” clarifies this. It is not the arising of the human attachment that is the fundamental issue but rather what we do when attachment arises. It is the rare individual for whom there is no object, no person, no thing in the world with which they identify, by which they are caught. Most of us, much of the time, do identify, do get caught. How do we react or respond when attachment arises? Often, it is only in the midst of anxiety, fear, sadness or anger - if we are lucky - that we notice that we are caught up, that we notice how we are and what we are doing, the reactive habits in the midst of the attachment. Do we notice the stress and suffering appearing and being created - whether “our own” or that of “others?” When things occur for us or for others, especially those we are “attached to,” events that are other than what we “want,” there may be an almost immediate reaction of stress, suffering, fear. Sometimes we can viscerally feel the tugging of attachment to parents, children, partners and others close to us. Other times, the strength of the reactiveness, the fear, stress, anxiety or anger, is what is most evident, if not overwhelming. And the reactions seem natural, a continuation of the seemingly natural connection and attachment. Merely “knowing” about the consequences of being caught in attachment is often of little use since the strength of the habitual reaction is visceral and immediate.

When my adult children lived abroad and I heard of their injury from accidents or illness, visceral reactions were almost immediate, palpable, despite the distance and the fact that there was little I could do from the distance. Visceral reactions can lead us to think that anxiety and stress are natural and appropriate. Our ongoing practice is to see and do what is called for specifically out of the moment that we are, out of this moment body-mind-world. What is skillful and appropriate? When my mother faced major illness at a great distance from me, ongoing practice was being listening and responding to her call, speaking to others near her who could do what might be needed; this was most of what I “could do” – in addition to travelling to visit and including her well being as part of my practice.

All sorts of doing across space is possible - by virtual connections, phone and so forth, and yet there is also lots we cannot do at any distance, no matter how close or far; lots we cannot change in the midst of the impermanence of life (whether in terms of “our life” or “others”). Life practice is in the midst of this changing condition, our opportunity of functioning is right here in this ongoing change – doing straightforward mind without attachment. It is always just this moment being, this moment effort that is needed. And of course, this moment effort manifests in cause and effect consequences. This is where our practice intentions and ongoing effort are to be exerted.

Joko encouraged developing the observer capacity so that one could be present – especially when in the midst of visceral reactions to circumstances. All sorts of practice supports, we can even call them practice “tricks,” can be used to enable us to do this. Of course, the most fundamental is ongoing sitting practice, ongoing formal practice. Bodily experiencing and noticing reactions is always the guideline, though it is our specific way of doing this, of supporting this right now, being right in the midst of the visceral reaction to “him” saying such and such or to “her” doing such and such, to “my” feeling such and such, that is most important – and that paradoxically enables and supports being present. If we miss this, and miss seeing the attachment and clinging, then we will go round and round in judgment of and upset about self and others. Being this moment is being present as we are doing, feeling, or believing, right now. This is embracing life - and seeing and working with what may be hindering and obscuring life.

There are many specific ways that we can work. It is the specifics that we can clarify with a guide or teacher. The way we work, this effort, is to enable us to be present right now, to be beyond the reactive habit. And when we do not know this, if we miss this, misunderstand it, then it is possible to get caught up in particular methods of working with clinging and emotional reactions.

The fundamental form of practice is zazen; the activities of a Zen Center are to support practicing together with others. Though Joko used all sorts of practice devices to shake up attachments, she also said to me, “Don’t be attached to any form,” in regard to the Bodhisattva precept “not begrudging the Dharma Treasure” (Being Generous/Not Being Greedy).

Of course, working with a teacher, a guide, is only a small piece of our life. The rest of the “time’ it is up to us to enlist and use the support of life to be practice, to be present, to be our “guide,” our “teacher.” And all of us “students” tend to hide some aspects of our life from our self and from others, including our “teacher(s).” Family relations, jobs, emotions and upsets are not separate from “Zen practice” - intelligent practice and our Bodhisattva life do not allow us to avoid these.

It is up to each of us to use our life practice supports to fully live this life that we are, this nonabiding in the midst of attachments naturally arising - arising of being born, having relations and connections; to not being caught by these relations, not being caught by birth, changing circumstances of impermanence, ageing, sickness, death. Please see what helps you to notice when you are “caught” and what is skillful practice for you right here. Always, in the midst of ongoing zazen, ongoing practice, please live your life well and appreciate this wonderful moment now. Be at peace.

(c) 2012 Elihu Genmyo Smith

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Extremism


"All extremism, fanaticism, and obscurantism come from a lack of security. A person who is secure cannot be an extremist."

Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik


It is good to reflect, what is security?  


It is certainly not merely economic security, especially not in the midst of the arising-passing impermanence of life-death. 


Lack of security is often another side of fear.


What is fear?


What is being no-fear? 


What is giving no-fear?


(c) 2011 Elihu Genmyo Smith

Thursday, November 17, 2011

Control Part 3


Carrying the self forward and confirming the universe is delusion.

The political and social realm is often the self writ large. Therefore, the "carrying the self" as the basis of fixing and changing is delusion and attachment that results in suffering and harm on the so-called individual level and for the so-called larger body politic.

In the midst of beginningless greed, anger and delusion, in the midst of the ignorance of dualistic self-centeredness, fiddling with improving and fixing by changing the self, the individual self or self of larger political and social entities (all the varied self manifestations),  may be unskillful - unless our effort is in the midst of at-one-ment, unless it is in the midst of nondoing, nonthinking, it may be driven by reactive self-centeredness.

The use of the control of others is an interesting phenomenon, a counterpoint to various self-improvement enterprises.

It may be hard for us to appreciate that Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, to name a few of the most notorious of twentieth century political leaders, were all trying to fix problems in the lives of  their nation, to improve the lives of their people.

They attempted to use governmental control of others as the way to improve the lives of the people.

Unfortunately, they also believed that there were those who were not included as the people, as "their people", as "their nation."

The "not included" were based on ethnic and racial criteria, religious criteria, social and economic positions, and even intellectual and educational status. It might be the Aryans versus non-Aryan, workers versus the capitalists, or even the 99% versus the 1%.

And this exclusion, this dualism of "included" versus "not-included", has justified all sorts of evils done to those not included. The above noted political leaders were so sure of their own vision (as were many other leaders throughout history) of what was right that they were willing to do all sorts of harm and violence, we can say evil,  in their attempt to attain their vision, to justify their vision. And we know the results of that in killing and suffering in the twentieth century.

In the twenty first century this continues, with extremists on the political left and right who justify using governmental power (and extra-governmental means) to enforce their vision on others and justify their abuses of power in the name of their vision.

This is also found in a number of non-governmental extremist movements in different parts of the world. In general, these sorts of extremist movements justify terrorism against those who are excluded from "their people," who believe and live by political and social norms different than their own, or against those who are not willing to submit to their control.

A recent worldwide example of this is the various forms of Islamist extremists (especially in the Middle East, Africa and south Asia) who justify terrorism against those not included in "their people", those whom they often denigrate by calling them infidels. This is evident in conflict between Sunni vs Shia Muslims, or Muslims vs non-Muslims or simply attacks on those who by the Islamist's standards have "insulted" Islam or not-followed a particular form of Islamic rules.

When we do not see and manifest Shakyamuni Buddha's  "I and all beings of the great earth together attain the way" then we believe that dualistic self-centeredness is natural. For all of us this perpetuates suffering and harm. And when we act it out politically the results are increased suffering and harm.

to be continued...

(c) 2011 Elihu Genmyo Smith

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Control Part 2

We may attempt to control what appears, disappears, what arises and passes.

Alternatively, we may attempt to control what we "do" with what arises, passes, the conditions and beings of life.

This "doing with" what arises includes noticing our reactions to what arises, and allowing that noticing to result in our practice effort, in appropriate and skillful response.

If we do not see the difference between these different "attempts to control",
if we confuse these different control attempts and treat them as if they were the same,
then we may be confusing self-centeredness and skillful action.  We may not be able to see what is ours to "do" and what is spinning off into dreams of delusion, attachment, greed and anger.

This confusion, especially if we are acting out of an attempt to control what arises, can result in all sorts of difficulties in life, difficulties in practice. Our efforts may further reinforce dualistic misperceptions and self-centered harm and suffering.

For more comments on this, see this audio talk:

http://www.prairiezen.org/Audio/Sunday/Not_fixing_self,_not%20defending_self;_forget_self_11-6-11.mp3

Here is a Jewish perspective on this matter: "Ultimately, the only power to which man should aspire is that which he exercises over himself." --- Elie Wiesel

(c) 2011 Elihu Genmyo Smith

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Control Part 1 - you don't own me

This is an old song, a wonderful Dharma song:

"You don't own me, no,

I'm not one of your little toys.

...Don't tell me what to do,

Don't tell me what to say." 



As a reminder from time to time, as a practice support, we should sing this song to our life, to body - mind, to others, to circumstances; and they can all sing this to us.

To rephrase something Joko Beck taught, "Your life is not about you..."

"Your life is not your business."

Here is a related Dharma talk:

http://www.prairiezen.org/Audio/Sunday/You_Dont_Own_Me_10-16-11.mp3


(c) 2011 Elihu Genmyo Smith



Monday, October 24, 2011

comprehension

Comprehension by Elihu Genmyo Smith

When we attempt to fit life into comprehension, there is dissatisfaction and suffering.

When we give comprehension to life, then comprehension nurtures joy.

(c) 2011 Elihu Genmyo Smith